I forgot to say, this fixes #1073

Thanks a lot for your contribution @wagnerluis1982

The fix looks good, but it would be great to have a test to ensure we won't have regressions on this in the future.

I see you are a first-time contributor, would you like to add your name to the contributor list?

@wagnerluis1982 A good test case would be to show that a filter on a command handler is not executed when the command in a message does not match the command defined in the handler.

darn, forgot there are no unitests. yeah we need them.
@wagnerluis1982 if you don't manage to get to it we'll add them but it'll take us a while since we have lot on our plate.

I added a unit test 👍

@jh0ker Sorry the delay, I was off in the weekend.

The fix looks good, but it would be great to have a test to ensure we won't have regressions on this in the future.

I was so eager to fix the issue that I didn't remember tests 🙄. I see you already did, so I'm too late now...

I see you are a first-time contributor, would you like to add your name to the contributor list?

It's always good 😄. Since I actively develop one bot, I intend to contribute more to the project.

@wagnerluis1982 thanks for your contribution