NOTE: Group allowlist functionality is due in 16.10 eta: March 21st

I will develop tests using the nightly builds image, and leave in draft until 16.10 is released

Ready for Review
Marked ready to review, tests are passing against the nightly build which includes the Group allowlist changes

For merge in will need to mark as XFail or have a feature flag based on if 16.10+ is active or no?

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.50%. Comparing base (7ec3189) to head (ee826ad).
Report is 48 commits behind head on main.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2816      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.52%   96.50%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          90       90              
  Lines        5872     5889      +17     
==========================================
+ Hits         5668     5683      +15     
- Misses        204      206       +2     

@nejch built on the work you started and some of the discussions we had a few months back, this adds support for managing the CI Job Token via python-gitlab.

Hi @nejch , @JohnVillalovos , @max-wittig , @bufferoverflow

Myself and @SachinKSingh28 among others will be working on a project to migrate from Gitlab-SAAS to Dedicate, alongside our work on GitLabForm project we will be adding in Enterprise feature sets to python-gitlab.

Would there be a good way to discuss a ways of working that is useful for the demands on your time, and if it would be helpful for us to also take on Maintainership of the project? As it's a key part of our infrastructure here at the DWP (a UK Gov public sector department)

Would there be a good way to discuss a ways of working that is useful for the demands on your time, and if it would be helpful for us to also take on Maintainership of the project? As it's a key part of our infrastructure here at the DWP (a UK Gov public sector department)

Nothing personal but after what happened to XZ project [1]. Having people asking to become maintainers is looked warily by me.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39865810

But I would be up for a video-conference if @nejch would like to do it. Doing a hackathon or something along those lines could be fun.

Overall this is looking pretty good to me. My suggestions are mostly minor.

Would there be a good way to discuss a ways of working that is useful for the demands on your time, and if it would be helpful for us to also take on Maintainership of the project? As it's a key part of our infrastructure here at the DWP (a UK Gov public sector department)

Nothing personal but after what happened to XZ project [1]. Having people asking to become maintainers is looked warily by me.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39865810

But I would be up for a video-conference if @nejch would like to do it. Doing a hackathon or something along those lines could be fun.

@JohnVillalovos -> Oh absolutely! We work in Security here, and having seen what happen with XZ is why I've not wanted to be too pushy 👍

We would be up for having a video-conference call etc. We're on BST

Updated PR

@JohnVillalovos updated once more, I certainly intended to have already covered those paths, but clearly hadn't so done now 👍

Thanks for the merge @JohnVillalovos

If you wanted to have a chat, we can talk through what we're doing with GitLab on our end and how that'll interface with python-gitlab.

Hopefully this calendly link should work: https://calendly.com/tim-knight1/30min

Thanks for the merge @JohnVillalovos

If you wanted to have a chat, we can talk through what we're doing with GitLab on our end and how that'll interface with python-gitlab.

Hopefully this calendly link should work: https://calendly.com/tim-knight1/30min

Meeting sounds great to me, but I would like to wait for @nejch to join. I'm assuming that he is on vacation or something as I haven't heard from him for a bit.