Conversation
|
I like this a lot! I'm still thinking about my comment from #1649 (comment). I'd limit it to issues and PRs where we're getting stuck because of user inaction, with no clarification - and not those that are confirmed bugs/valid requests but we haven't done anything about them. Does that make sense? For that we could maybe use I'd also make it a bit more lenient (maybe 90 days for stale, 15 days to close) in case people are on vacation? Sometimes even I don't respond to an issue within 30 days.. 😸 |
That could work. Just need to figure out what we want to use. But I would use
90 days! Seems so long 😁 But yeah can do that. |
JohnVillalovos
force-pushed
the
jlvillal/stale
branch
4 times, most recently
from
43f1743 to
0b87e22
Compare
nejch
left a comment
nejch
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we can go ahead with this with a few labels as suggested above @JohnVillalovos WDYT?
Use the stale action to close issues and pull-requests with no activity. Issues: It will mark them as stale after 60 days and then close them once they have been stale for 15 days. Pull-Requests: It will mark pull-requests as stale after 90 days and then close them once they have been stale for 15 days. https://github.com/actions/stale Closes: #1649
JohnVillalovos
force-pushed
the
jlvillal/stale
branch
from
0b87e22 to
2c036a9
Compare
3 participants
Use the stale action to close issues and pull-requests with no
activity.
Issues: It will mark them as stale after 60 days and then close
them once they have been stale for 15 days.
Pull-Requests: It will mark pull-requests as stale after 90 days and then close
them once they have been stale for 15 days.
https://github.com/actions/stale
Closes: #1649