bpo-30361: Use better example for mixed-type operands#1701
bpo-30361: Use better example for mixed-type operands#1701terryjreedy merged 1 commit intopython:masterfrom gfyoung:fix-issue-30361
Conversation
|
@gfyoung, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @serhiy-storchaka, @ezio-melotti and @birkenfeld to be potential reviewers. |
|
Hello, and thanks for your contribution! I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA). Unfortunately our records indicate you have not signed the CLA. For legal reasons we need you to sign this before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue. Thanks again to your contribution and we look forward to looking at it! |
I just had it signed approximately an hour ago. How long does it take to propagate? |
Doc/tutorial/introduction.rst
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Wouldn't be better to use the example that takes the integer result? There is nothing unexpected that 3 * 3.75 results a float, it can't be an int. But 4 * 3.75 is an integer of type float even if it can be represented as int.
.gitignore
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oops. Will put in separate PR.
|
@serhiy-storchaka : Do you have any updates on this? |
6 participants
Title is self-explanatory. If this patch is accepted, I can also backport to the 3.6 branch.