Fix for operators @@, @> and <@.#135
Merged
glenebob merged 2 commits intonpgsql:masterfrom Dec 24, 2013
glenebob:fulltext_operator_fix
Merged
Fix for operators @@, @> and <@.#135glenebob merged 2 commits intonpgsql:masterfrom glenebob:fulltext_operator_fix
glenebob merged 2 commits intonpgsql:masterfrom
glenebob:fulltext_operator_fix
Conversation
…@, @> and <@. Fix bug that would turn operators @@, @> and <@ in ::, :>, and <: respectively. Add tests for said operator butchery.
|
Great, It works with my EF tests.... |
Remove a couple bits of redundant and ineffective code in the scanner.
glenebob
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 24, 2013
Fix for operators @@, @> and <@.
franciscojunior
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 28, 2014
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes the query rewrite bug, revealed by PR #116, that would butcher the @@, @> and <@ operators.
@jjchiw, if you would, please test this to make sure it fixes the problems you were having.
-Glen