DOC: Fix invalid nose argument in testing.rst#7727
Merged
NelleV merged 1 commit intomatplotlib:masterfrom Jan 11, 2017
petehuang:doc-remove-nose-verbose
Merged
DOC: Fix invalid nose argument in testing.rst#7727NelleV merged 1 commit intomatplotlib:masterfrom petehuang:doc-remove-nose-verbose
NelleV merged 1 commit intomatplotlib:masterfrom
petehuang:doc-remove-nose-verbose
Conversation
tacaswell
approved these changes
Jan 2, 2017
tacaswell
changed the title
Member
|
Thanks for the patch! |
Member
|
Backported to |
QuLogic
changed the title
QuLogic
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2017
DOC: Fix invalid nose argument in testing.rst
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #7649
It looks like the intent of the example was to demonstrate usage of the nose arguments that were mentioned right before. Instead of removing like #7649 suggests, I changed it to the right argument