DOC: update new contributor guidance re timelines, AI, reaching out#31163
DOC: update new contributor guidance re timelines, AI, reaching out#31163timhoffm merged 1 commit intomatplotlib:mainfrom
Conversation
56c8e27 to
ce07f90
Compare
b995981 to
2ed8092
Compare
2ed8092 to
60dd2e2
Compare
|
I really need to stop reusing branch names, it creates all sorts of git horribleness (I never remember I'm reusing them) |
Try more specific ones, e.g. here |
| complicated issue for your first contribution - please ask in the incubator | ||
| channel if you need help gauging the complexity of the work. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| complicated issue for your first contribution - please ask in the incubator | |
| channel if you need help gauging the complexity of the work. | |
| complicated issue for your first contribution - please ask in the *new | |
| contributor channel* if you need help gauging the complexity of the work. |
That's what it's called above.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it's called incubator on gitter/discourse, so Ill streamline to that
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Semi OT: Is incubator a good name? It’s rather an advanced word that people with little English knowledge may not know. Also I’m not clear how welcoming it sounds.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I dunno, it's what we decided on back when @melissawm was contributor experience lead the first time. We can discuss again, but I think is out of scope here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Re: name, I don't have strong opinions! We could try "New contributor space" or something if it makes it clearer.
As far as instructions go, I'm not sure it's clear to new contributors that the incubator is a chat on the discourse interface (I didn't know discourse had a chat feature until a month ago!)
This should probably be mentioned here: https://matplotlib.org/devdocs/devel/contribute.html#contributor-incubator but I think can be a follow-up.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, I think name change is maybe a separate discussion and we should probably discuss on the call if it's time to move the chat links to discourse (I think we've adopted it at this point)
I remembered what this branch is about, I just forgot I'd (and apparently other people) had used this name before :/ locally I renamed it to contrib-timeline as part of cleaning up my git mess. |
78aacbb to
05ca319
Compare
|
updated w/ the second commit from #31124 which pulled in "please do direct translation" guidance cause I think it makes more sense here |
05ca319 to
bdd70d7
Compare
bdd70d7 to
deb6f48
Compare
ncm + use direct translations Co-authored-by: Ruth Comer <10599679+rcomer@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tim Hoffmann <2836374+timhoffm@users.noreply.github.com>
deb6f48 to
2bed91e
Compare
PR summary
Incorporates timeline/complexity discussion from #29686 (comment),
attempts to direct complete newbies to talk to us before they try to tackle an issue, and updates the AI policy to encourage using direct translations.
draft cause I haven't built the docs locally yet
PR checklist