[CI] Skip tests on doc-only changes#25261
Conversation
| !contains(github.event.head_commit.message, '[ci skip]') && | ||
| !contains(github.event.head_commit.message, '[skip ci]') && | ||
| !contains(github.event.head_commit.message, '[skip github]') && | ||
| !contains(github.event.head_commit.message, '[ci doc]') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[ci doc] should still be useful if you make a docstring only change. [skip github] is specific to these tests, whereas GitHub’s [skip actions] will skip all the GitHub actions. I don’t know whether that difference is important enough to keep [skip github] (we don’t actually advertise it in the dev guide).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good point. I guess my thought is that anytime I have to explicitly opt-out of running CI by putting in a commit message I probably won't do that, so in general I was just trying to clean up the file a bit. But, we can leave these in too since they don't hurt anything.
|
Presumably tests will still run if you edit e.g. both an example and some mpl functionality? That doesn’t seem obvious from the GitHub docs. |
Yes, it should cover that case, with an example here:
|
| # No need to test on documentation changes | ||
| - 'doc/**' | ||
| - 'examples/**' | ||
| - 'tutorials/**' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Need to add plot_types. Note if we get #25209 in we can just test on "galleries/**"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 We can add more later no problem. I guess an alternative question for the future is whether we really want these at the top-level of the repository versus living under doc/galleries, doc/plot_types etc... which would then allow just doc/** to be ignored.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We don't want to do that because then sphinx will try and process them and it will be confusing what the source and result of sphinx-gallery processing them is. However, getting them under one subdirectory at the top level is the goal of #25209
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ahh, I see. I have not been following the docs reorganization. That does seem like a nice change!
|
I'll merge since there is no point in running CI on a CI change... |
4 participants
PR Summary
We don't need to waste CI cycles for doc-only changes and having to remember to add
[doc skip]to commit messages is asking a lot of users. Also removed extra CI conditionals for skipping that are already handled by GitHub: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/managing-workflow-runs/skipping-workflow-runs(except [skip github], but that isn't documented and it should really be [skip actions], so let's just remove all of them).
I tested this on an example PR on my fork to verify: greglucas#21
I only added this to
pull_request:, we could also add this topush:, but it seems fine to run tests on every push tomainregardless.PR Checklist
Documentation and Tests
pytestpasses)Release Notes
.. versionadded::directive in the docstring and documented indoc/users/next_whats_new/.. versionchanged::directive in the docstring and documented indoc/api/next_api_changes/next_whats_new/README.rstornext_api_changes/README.rst