Support parallel sphinx building#9098
Merged
takluyver merged 1 commit intoipython:masterfrom Dec 22, 2015
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
Looks fine to me. We don't actually use the IPython directive in our own docs, so we largely rely on projects like matplotlib and pandas to notice things like this. |
takluyver
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 22, 2015
Support parallel sphinx building
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This marks the sphinx extensions that ship with IPython as being safe for parallel reading.
See here for the relevant part of the Sphinx spec.
See matplotlib/matplotlib#5597: We'd like to have this in matplotlib, since parallel doc building cuts the build time in half from 9 minutes to 4.5 minutes.