fix(cmd): Use buffered reads#389
Merged
Byron merged 1 commit intogitpython-developers:masterfrom Feb 25, 2016
csnover:csnover-buffer-reads
Merged
fix(cmd): Use buffered reads#389Byron merged 1 commit intogitpython-developers:masterfrom csnover:csnover-buffer-reads
Byron merged 1 commit intogitpython-developers:masterfrom
csnover:csnover-buffer-reads
Conversation
Popen defaults to using unbuffered reads, which are extremely slow.
Member
|
Thanks for bringing this up ! Even though I might have had the hunch that parsing git command output is a bit slow, it never struck me as being due to disabled buffering - apparently I wanted to believe it's just due to python. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Popen in many versions of Python (possibly all versions prior to 3.3.1?) defaults to using unbuffered reads (bufsize=0), which are extremely slow. When reading a 160k-line file from git, unbuffered reads take 5.75s; buffered reads take 0.23s.
Newer versions of Python 3 appear to change the default to bufsize=-1 so this may only be a problem for a subset of users, but it certainly was a problem for me. I’m not sure of any reason not to just use buffered reads by default for everyone, so I am submitting this patch for evaluation. Thanks!