unify bundle names #5776
Description
from: https://code.angularjs.org/2.0.0-alpha.52/
web_worker/ 10-Dec-2015 09:09 -
ui.dev.js 10-Dec-2015 09:09 1143996
worker.dev.js 10-Dec-2015 09:09 1707152
angular2-polyfills.js 10-Dec-2015 09:09 118236
angular2-polyfills.min.js 10-Dec-2015 09:09 30378
angular2-testing.umd.dev.js 10-Dec-2015 09:09 5306510
angular2.dev.js 10-Dec-2015 09:09 1264363
angular2.js 10-Dec-2015 09:09 1264359
angular2.min.js 10-Dec-2015 09:09 642941
angular2.umd.dev.js 10-Dec-2015 09:09 5006149
angular2.umd.js 10-Dec-2015 09:09 1598201
angular2.umd.min.js 10-Dec-2015 09:09 589653
http.dev.js 10-Dec-2015 09:09 48415
http.js 10-Dec-2015 09:09 48411
http.min.js 10-Dec-2015 09:09 26501
router.dev.js 10-Dec-2015 09:09 116373
router.js 10-Dec-2015 09:09 116369
router.min.js 10-Dec-2015 09:09 62272
testing.js 10-Dec-2015 09:09 96654
testing.js.map 10-Dec-2015 09:09 107010
the ones that stick out are:
- why are web_worker bundles in special dir? why not prefix them with
angular2-webworkeror something and put in them in the same dir? -
angular2.umd.jsandangular2.jsare not equal when it comes to content, why make the name look like they differ only in format? -
angular2-testing.umd.dev.jsis prefixed withangular2-buttesting.jsis not - some bundles have
devvariant, others don't - seems a bit random -
web_workeruses underscore separators while-testingand-polyfillsuse dashes. do we need both? maybe if we rename webworker bundles as suggested in the first item, we can avoid this inconsistency..