X Tutup
Skip to content

call set-azdoprojectinfo and set-azdoauthtoken in the right order#20306

Merged
daxian-dbw merged 1 commit intoPowerShell:masterfrom
JamesWTruher:AzDO_Build_Fix01
Sep 19, 2023
Merged

call set-azdoprojectinfo and set-azdoauthtoken in the right order#20306
daxian-dbw merged 1 commit intoPowerShell:masterfrom
JamesWTruher:AzDO_Build_Fix01

Conversation

@JamesWTruher
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

due to caching, the project info must be set before setting the authorization token

PR Summary

PR Context

PR Checklist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@daxian-dbw daxian-dbw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@daxian-dbw daxian-dbw merged commit 278ab41 into PowerShell:master Sep 19, 2023
@daxian-dbw daxian-dbw added Backport-7.2.x-Consider BackPort-7.4.x-Consider CL-BuildPackaging Indicates that a PR should be marked as a build or packaging change in the Change Log labels Sep 19, 2023
@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 10 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +5 -5
Percentile : 4%

Total files changed: 1

Change summary by file extension:
.yml : +5 -5

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

TravisEz13 pushed a commit to TravisEz13/PowerShell that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2023
TravisEz13 pushed a commit to TravisEz13/PowerShell that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2023
daxian-dbw pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2023
daxian-dbw pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2023
daxian-dbw pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Backport-7.2.x-Done Backport-7.3.x-Done BackPort-7.4.x-Done CL-BuildPackaging Indicates that a PR should be marked as a build or packaging change in the Change Log Extra Small

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

X Tutup