Message 97516 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	alexandre.vassalotti, collinwinter, jcsalterego, pitrou, skip.montanaro
Date	2010-01-10.15:52:22
SpamBayes Score	0.0021785956
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1263138802.3610.7.camel@localhost>
In-reply-to	<19273.62584.224409.827957@montanaro.dyndns.org>

Content
> Indeed there are. Given that the Unladen Swallow folks were focusing on the > 2.6 branch and their goal was to improve performance I don't see any reason > to not accept what they've done, then tweak it for 2.7/3.1 assuming the > changes you and Alexandre suggested further improve performance. The main thing I'm worried about is the potentially unbounded buffering, since it could reduce performance (or even thrash the machine) instead of improving it.

> Indeed there are.  Given that the Unladen Swallow folks were focusing on the
> 2.6 branch and their goal was to improve performance I don't see any reason
> to not accept what they've done, then tweak it for 2.7/3.1 assuming the
> changes you and Alexandre suggested further improve performance.

The main thing I'm worried about is the potentially unbounded buffering,
since it could reduce performance (or even thrash the machine) instead
of improving it.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-01-10 15:52:26	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, skip.montanaro, collinwinter, alexandre.vassalotti, jcsalterego
2010-01-10 15:52:23	pitrou	link	issue5683 messages
2010-01-10 15:52:22	pitrou	create