Message 400628 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	vstinner
Recipients	Antony.Lee, brett.cannon, hrik2001, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, vstinner
Date	2021-08-30.15:51:53
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1630338713.62.0.952620825379.issue44019@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
> An actual use case I had for such an operator was collecting a bunch of callables in a list and wanting to dispatch them to concurrent.futures.Executor.map, i.e. something like `executor.map(operator.call, funcs)` (to get the parallelized version of `[func() for func in funcs]`). Can't you use functools.partial() for that?

> An actual use case I had for such an operator was collecting a bunch of callables in a list and wanting to dispatch them to concurrent.futures.Executor.map, i.e. something like `executor.map(operator.call, funcs)` (to get the parallelized version of `[func() for func in funcs]`).

Can't you use functools.partial() for that?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2021-08-30 15:51:53	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, brett.cannon, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, Antony.Lee, hrik2001
2021-08-30 15:51:53	vstinner	set	messageid: <1630338713.62.0.952620825379.issue44019@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-08-30 15:51:53	vstinner	link	issue44019 messages
2021-08-30 15:51:53	vstinner	create